



impossible to
possible

LucyBrain Switzerland ○ AI Daily
Cross-Platform AI Prompting 2026: Text, Image & Video Unified Framework
December 28, 2025
TL;DR: What You'll Learn
The same five-component framework works across all AI modalities—only implementation changes, not structure
Role translates from expertise (text) to style reference (image) to cinematic approach (video)
Context shifts from background information to compositional guidance to motion direction
Constraints adapt from word counts to aspect ratios to frame rates
Understanding translation patterns lets you move prompts across tools efficiently
Most people learn prompting separately for each AI tool. They develop ChatGPT techniques, then start over learning Midjourney, then begin again with Sora.
This wastes learning effort because prompting principles remain constant across modalities. The five-component framework—Role, Task, Context, Style, Constraints—applies universally. What changes is how each component manifests in different media.
Understanding these translation patterns means mastering one framework that works everywhere rather than learning disconnected techniques for each tool.
This article explains how to translate prompts across text, image, and video AI while maintaining effectiveness and avoiding platform-specific mistakes.
The Universal Framework
Five components structure every effective prompt regardless of output type.
The components:
Role - What expertise, perspective, or style to apply
Task - What output format and structure to create
Context - What background information and constraints to consider
Style - How to communicate or what aesthetic to use
Constraints - What technical limits and requirements to respect
Why this works universally:
These components address fundamental communication requirements that exist across all modalities:
Every generation needs direction about approach (Role)
Every output needs structure specification (Task)
Every result needs grounding in situation (Context)
Every creation needs aesthetic guidance (Style)
Every format needs technical parameters (Constraints)
The framework isn't about text AI specifically—it's about complete instruction. Text, images, and video all require complete instruction; they just require it in different forms.
Component Translation Patterns
How each component adapts across modalities.
Role Translation
Text AI (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini): Role = Expertise and perspective
Activates knowledge domains and establishes voice authority.
Examples:
"You are a venture capital analyst"
"You are a technical writer for developers"
"You are a crisis communications consultant"
Image AI (Midjourney, DALL-E): Role = Style reference and aesthetic approach
Activates visual patterns associated with specific artists, photographers, or movements.
Examples:
"Photographed by Annie Leibovitz"
"Oil painting in the style of John Singer Sargent"
"Apple product photography aesthetic"
Video AI (Sora, VEO): Role = Cinematic style and directorial approach
Activates motion patterns and visual storytelling associated with specific filmmakers or genres.
Examples:
"Wes Anderson style: symmetrical compositions, deliberate movements"
"Documentary style: handheld observational, natural lighting"
"Apple product video aesthetic: slow smooth camera, minimal clean"
Translation principle: Role shifts from "who knows" (text) to "who creates visually" (image) to "who directs motion" (video). The function remains constant—establishing which learned patterns to activate.
Task Translation
Text AI: Task = Output format and structural requirements
Specifies document type, organization, and elements.
Examples:
"Create a 5-email sequence, each 150-200 words"
"Write a technical specification with: overview, architecture, API reference, examples"
"Generate bullet-point summary with 3 main points, 2 supporting details each"
Image AI: Task = Composition structure and visual elements
Specifies what's in frame and how it's organized spatially.
Examples:
"Portrait composition: subject left third, negative space right for text"
"Product photography: item centered, occupies 60% of frame"
"Environmental scene: foreground detail sharp, background environmental context"
Video AI: Task = Shot sequence and temporal structure
Specifies what happens when and how shots connect.
Examples:
"10-second sequence: close-up detail (3sec), pull back to context (4sec), settle on wide shot (3sec)"
"Three-shot demo: unboxing (4sec), feature demonstration (6sec), user reaction (5sec)"
"Continuous shot: subject enters left, walks to center, interacts with object, exits right"
Translation principle: Task shifts from structural organization (text) to spatial composition (image) to temporal sequence (video). All specify "what to create," adapted to medium.
Context Translation
Text AI: Context = Background information and situational constraints
Provides information AI needs to make appropriate content decisions.
Examples:
"Target audience: technical decision-makers familiar with cloud infrastructure"
"Previous email series had 23% open rate, this needs improvement"
"Company recently rebranded, avoid mentioning old product names"
Image AI: Context = Compositional guidance and environmental specifics
Provides spatial relationships and setting details.
Examples:
"Subject positioned left showing environment on right—this is for website hero with text overlay space"
"Outdoor setting, natural afternoon light, background should suggest upscale residential area"
"Product used in office environment, professional but not sterile, suggest productivity context"
Video AI: Context = Motion direction and narrative purpose
Provides temporal guidance and how elements relate through time.
Examples:
"Camera follows subject maintaining consistent framing as they move—this demonstrates product portability"
"Subject motion should appear natural not staged—target audience skeptical of marketing"
"Environment transitions from cluttered to organized showing problem-solution narrative"
Translation principle: Context shifts from informational background (text) to spatial guidance (image) to motion rationale (video). All ground the output in purpose.
Style Translation
Text AI: Style = Voice, tone, and communication approach
Establishes how content should read and feel.
Examples:
"Harvard Business Review style: third-person, data-driven, executive audience"
"Conversational but professional—more casual than legal brief, more structured than text message"
"Empathetic and supportive—mental health context requires careful language"
Image AI: Style = Aesthetic characteristics and visual feel
Establishes how image should look and emotional impact.
Examples:
"Kinfolk magazine aesthetic: natural light, muted earth tones, generous negative space"
"Editorial fashion—artistic composition, environmental storytelling, not catalog product shots"
"Moody and contemplative—deep shadows, muted colors, intimate frame"
Video AI: Style = Cinematic feel and motion characteristics
Establishes how video should move and emotional progression.
Examples:
"Contemplative pacing—slow deliberate camera movements, lingering moments"
"Energetic and dynamic—quick cuts, varied angles, rhythmic progression"
"Intimate observational—handheld subtlety, natural motion, documentary authenticity"
Translation principle: Style maintains focus on emotional impact and aesthetic intention across all media. Implementation varies but purpose constant.
Constraints Translation
Text AI: Constraints = Length, format, and technical requirements
Ensures output fits intended use technically.
Examples:
"150 words maximum, markdown format, no special characters"
"Email subject line under 50 characters (mobile preview limit)"
"Plain text only—no HTML, no formatting, ASCII characters only"
Image AI: Constraints = Technical specs and composition requirements
Ensures output works for intended platform and use.
Examples:
"16:9 aspect ratio, 1920x1080 minimum resolution, horizontal composition"
"Pure white background RGB 255,255,255—e-commerce requirement"
"Subject must remain in center 50% of frame—mobile cropping safe area"
Video AI: Constraints = Duration, technical parameters, and motion limits
Ensures output fits platform requirements and maintains usability.
Examples:
"15 seconds maximum duration, 9:16 vertical for social stories"
"Subject stays center-frame throughout—mobile safe area for vertical crop"
"24fps cinematic feel, smooth motion only (no fast cuts or spins)"
Translation principle: Constraints shift from textual specifications (text) to spatial/resolution requirements (image) to temporal/technical parameters (video). All prevent technically unusable outputs.
Translation In Practice
Applying framework across different scenarios.
Scenario 1: Product Launch Content Across Platforms
Core concept: New productivity software launch targeting busy professionals
Text Version (Email Announcement):
"You are a B2B SaaS marketing manager [ROLE] writing to existing customers. Create launch announcement email [TASK] with: subject line, opening (why this matters), 3 key benefits (focus on time savings), CTA (try new feature), closing. Target: busy professionals who value efficiency, skeptical of feature bloat [CONTEXT]. Professional but energetic tone—excited without hype [STYLE]. 200 words max, single CTA, avoid technical jargon [CONSTRAINTS]."
Image Version (Launch Graphics):
"Modern tech product photography style [ROLE]: laptop showing new software interface, clean workspace setting [TASK]. Professional using software visible in background (soft focus), foreground sharp on screen showing key feature [CONTEXT: convey productivity in real work environment]. Bright aspirational feel—professional but approachable, modern tech aesthetic [STYLE]. 16:9 horizontal for website banner, 1920x1080px, screen content must be readable, avoid cluttered desk [CONSTRAINTS]."
Video Version (Feature Demo):
"Apple product video aesthetic [ROLE]: 15-second feature demonstration [TASK]. Shot sequence: hands open laptop (2sec), cursor navigates to new feature (5sec), feature demonstrates time-saving automation (6sec), satisfied user reaction close-up (2sec). Overhead angle transitions to over-shoulder for feature demo, smooth camera movements [CONTEXT]. Clean minimal style, soft natural lighting, warm color grade, deliberate not rushed pacing [STYLE]. 16:9 web format, 24fps, subject remains upper center frame, smooth transitions only [CONSTRAINTS]."
What stayed constant:
Professional but approachable tone
Focus on time-saving benefit
Target audience: busy professionals
Modern aesthetic appropriate for tech product
What translated:
Role: Marketing manager → Product photography style → Apple video aesthetic
Task: Email structure → Composition layout → Shot sequence
Context: Audience skepticism → Environmental storytelling → Motion purpose
Style: Energetic without hype → Bright aspirational → Clean minimal
Constraints: Word count → Resolution/aspect ratio → Duration/frame rate
Scenario 2: Educational Content Across Modalities
Core concept: Tutorial on coffee brewing technique
Text Version (Blog Post):
"You are a coffee education specialist [ROLE] explaining pour-over technique to enthusiastic beginners [CONTEXT]. Create step-by-step guide [TASK] with: overview, 5 main steps with timing, common mistakes, tips for improvement. Encouraging and clear tone—technical accuracy without intimidation [STYLE]. 800 words, include timing for each step, beginner-friendly language avoiding coffee-snob jargon [CONSTRAINTS]."
Image Version (Instructional Diagram):
"Instructional photography style [ROLE]: overhead view of pour-over coffee preparation [TASK]. Show hand positioning, water pour pattern, coffee bloom visible, complete setup in frame including scale and timer [CONTEXT: educational clarity priority]. Clean bright lighting eliminates all shadows, every element clearly visible, colors saturated for instructional clarity [STYLE]. 4:3 aspect ratio, high resolution for print detail, white background, no decorative elements that distract from technique [CONSTRAINTS]."
Video Version (Tutorial Demo):
"Educational YouTube style [ROLE]: 30-second pour-over demonstration [TASK]. Overhead locked camera, hands visible throughout showing: grind placement (3sec), bloom pour circular motion (8sec), main pour in spiral pattern (12sec), final result (7sec). Clear instructional focus—movements slow and deliberate, each step distinct [CONTEXT]. Even soft lighting, patient pacing, hands move deliberately showing technique clearly [STYLE]. 16:9 horizontal, locked camera (no movement), high detail for clarity, real-time pacing not sped up [CONSTRAINTS]."
Translation notes:
Educational purpose maintained across all versions
Beginner-friendly approach consistent
Step-by-step structure adapted to medium
Clarity prioritized over aesthetic flourishes
Technical accuracy balanced with accessibility
Common Translation Mistakes
Mistake 1: Direct Literal Translation
Problem: Copying text prompt language directly into image prompt
"You are a marketing professional. Create an image that conveys expertise and trustworthiness to business audiences while maintaining approachable demeanor suitable for consulting services targeting mid-market companies."
This text-style language doesn't activate visual patterns effectively.
Fix: Translate to visual language
"Corporate portrait in McKinsey consultant style: confident approachable professional, natural smile, business casual attire, soft professional lighting, neutral office background slightly blurred, contemporary corporate aesthetic"
Mistake 2: Losing Core Intent in Translation
Problem: Focusing on technical adaptation while forgetting original purpose
Original text prompt emphasizes empathy and careful language for mental health content. Image translation focuses only on aesthetic "professional calm blue tones" and misses the empathy requirement.
Fix: Preserve intent through appropriate adaptation
Text focus: Empathy, careful supportive language Image equivalent: Warm approachable lighting, soft focus, intimate composition suggesting safety and support (not clinical/cold)
Mistake 3: Over-Constraining Across Modalities
Problem: Maintaining overly specific details that don't translate
Text prompt specifies "exactly 3 examples, 2 sentences each, alternating between technical and accessible language"
Translated to image: Tries to force "exactly 3 visual elements" when composition might work better with different number
Fix: Translate intent not specifics
Text intent: Balanced examples with varied complexity levels Image equivalent: Composition showing range from simple to complex, visual hierarchy guides eye through increasing detail
Mistake 4: Ignoring Medium-Specific Strengths
Problem: Forcing text-appropriate content into image/video without considering medium strengths
Text prompt about abstract strategic concepts translated literally to video—tries to show abstract ideas visually in clumsy metaphors
Fix: Adapt content to medium or recognize some concepts don't translate
Abstract strategy concepts: Better in text Concrete processes: Better in image/video Motion/transformation: Best in video Complex reasoning: Best in text
Choose medium appropriate for content type.
For detailed mistake prevention, see Avoiding Common AI Prompt Mistakes: Over-Constraining, Ambiguity & Context Assumptions.
Building Cross-Platform Fluency
Develop translation skills through practice.
Exercise 1: Same Concept, Three Modalities
Take single concept and prompt it in text, image, and video:
Concept: "Demonstrating reliability and precision"
Text: What role, style, evidence examples convey this? Image: What composition, lighting, visual elements convey this? Video: What motion, pacing, camera behavior convey this?
Compare how each medium expresses same core message.
Exercise 2: Reverse Translation
Find excellent image prompt, translate it to text prompt that would describe same concept:
Image prompt: "Product photography, Apple aesthetic, minimal clean, soft lighting..." Text equivalent: "You are a product description writer using Apple's minimalist approach—clean concise language, focus on essential benefits, elegant simplicity..."
Understand how visual language maps to verbal.
Exercise 3: Constraint Mapping
List text constraints, translate to image and video equivalents:
Text: "150 words maximum" Image: "Subject occupies 60% of frame maximum" Video: "15 seconds duration maximum"
Text: "Professional but approachable tone" Image: "Corporate aesthetic with warm accessible lighting" Video: "Smooth professional motion with handheld humanity"
Build vocabulary of equivalent constraints across media.
For advanced cross-modal techniques, see Style & Tone for AI Prompts: How to Communicate Like a Human Across ChatGPT, Midjourney & Sora.
The Translation Checklist
Before translating prompt across platforms, verify:
☐ Core intent identified What's the fundamental message or purpose?
☐ Medium-appropriate adaptation planned Does this concept work well in target medium?
☐ Role translated appropriately Expertise (text) → Style reference (image) → Cinematic approach (video)
☐ Task adapted to medium Structure (text) → Composition (image) → Sequence (video)
☐ Context converted to medium needs Background (text) → Spatial (image) → Motion (video)
☐ Style maintains emotional intent Tone (text) → Aesthetic (image) → Feel (video)
☐ Constraints respect technical requirements Format limits (text) → Resolution specs (image) → Duration/frame rate (video)
☐ Original purpose preserved Does translated version serve same goal as original?
Frequently Asked Questions
Can every text prompt be translated to image or video?
No. Abstract concepts, complex reasoning, and detailed explanations work better in text. Concrete visuals, processes, transformations, and demonstrations work better in image/video. Choose medium appropriate for content type. Translation works when concept suits target medium.
How do I know which medium to use for a concept?
Consider: Is it abstract or concrete? (concrete → visual). Does it involve motion or change? (yes → video). Does it require complex reasoning? (yes → text). Does spatial relationship matter? (yes → image). Match medium to content characteristics.
Why do my translated prompts produce different quality than originals?
Likely translating literally rather than adapting appropriately. "You are a marketing expert" in image prompt doesn't work—needs visual equivalent like "Corporate photography aesthetic." Review each component's translation pattern for target medium.
Should I use the same constraints across all platforms?
No. Constraints adapt to medium requirements. Text word counts don't translate to image. Image aspect ratios don't translate to video duration. Understand equivalent constraints: text length ≈ image composition percentage ≈ video duration for conveying same amount of content.
How do I translate tone from text to visual media?
Map emotional intent to visual characteristics. Professional tone → clean composition, proper lighting. Casual tone → handheld feel, natural lighting. Urgent tone → high contrast, energetic. Calm tone → soft colors, gentle motion. Emotional impact translates across media through different technical means.
Can I use the same prompt template across all three modalities?
Not literally, but the five-component structure applies universally. Create three versions of template—one for text with text-specific language, one for image with visual language, one for video with motion language. Same structure, different implementation vocabulary.
What's the fastest way to become fluent in cross-platform translation?
Practice with 10 concepts. Prompt each in text, image, video. Compare how same message manifests differently. Notice which components translate directly vs require complete rewriting. Build intuition about translation patterns through repetition.
Do translation patterns work for all AI tools within each category?
Yes. ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini share text patterns. Midjourney/DALL-E share image patterns. Sora/VEO share video patterns. Tool-specific optimization tweaks exist, but translation framework applies across all tools in each category.
Related Reading
Foundation:
The Prompt Anatomy Framework: Why 90% of AI Prompts Fail Across ChatGPT, Midjourney & Sora - Five-component framework foundation
Modality-Specific Guides:
Best AI Prompts for ChatGPT, Claude & Gemini in 2026: Templates, Examples & Scorecard - Text AI mastery
Midjourney & DALL-E Image Prompts 2026: From Concept to Perfect Visual Output - Image generation
Sora & VEO Video AI Prompts 2026: Cinematic Storytelling Made Simple - Video generation
Diagnostic & Optimization:
AI Prompt Evaluation Checklist: Diagnose Why Your Prompts Fail & Fix Them Fast - Works across all platforms
AI Prompt Iteration & Optimization: How to Get First-Attempt Quality Every Time - Cross-platform refinement
Component Deep Dives:
Role & Context in AI Prompts: Unlocking Expert-Level Outputs in Text, Image & Video AI - Translation focus
Style & Tone for AI Prompts: How to Communicate Like a Human Across ChatGPT, Midjourney & Sora - Aesthetic translation
Pitfall Prevention:
Avoiding Common AI Prompt Mistakes: Over-Constraining, Ambiguity & Context Assumptions - Translation mistakes
Templates:
AI Prompt Templates Library 2026: Ready-to-Use Prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney & Sora - Cross-platform examples
www.topfreeprompts.com
Access 80,000+ professionally engineered prompts across text, image, and video AI. Every prompt demonstrates five-component framework translation patterns, showing how same concepts adapt across ChatGPT, Midjourney, and Sora effectively.



