Your ChatGPT, Midjourney, Gemini, Grok Prompt
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini Prompts for Professional Legal Brief Development

ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini Prompts for Professional Legal Brief Development

Legal Writing & Argumentation | ChatGPT Prompt

Legal Writing & Argumentation | ChatGPT Prompt

AI Prompt:

Create a structured legal brief for the following legal argument from the perspective of an experienced legal writer with expertise in persuasive legal argumentation. Legal position to argue: [LEGAL_POSITION] Opposing position: [OPPOSING_POSITION] Relevant jurisdiction: [JURISDICTION] Please create a comprehensive legal brief structure including: Introduction/Summary of Argument: Concise statement of the legal issue presented Clear statement of the position being advocated Brief overview of the strongest supporting authorities Requested outcome or relief sought Roadmap of the arguments to follow Legal Standard: Applicable standard of review or burden of proof Key statutory language or precedential tests that govern Threshold requirements that must be satisfied Legal framework for analyzing the specific issue Factual Background: Relevant factual context presented objectively Procedural history as necessary Key undisputed facts that support the argument Strategic presentation of favorable facts Argument Section I: [PRIMARY_ARGUMENT] Clear argument heading that states the conclusion Primary legal authority supporting this argument Application of law to the specific facts of this case Anticipated counterarguments and refutations Policy considerations that strengthen the position Argument Section II: [SECONDARY_ARGUMENT] Clear argumentative heading Supporting authorities and precedents Factual application Distinction of adverse authorities Response to likely opposing arguments Argument Section III: [ADDITIONAL_ARGUMENT] Additional argument structure following the same pattern Alternative arguments or secondary theories Distinguishing unfavorable precedent Addressing potential weaknesses in the position Conclusion: Concise restatement of the position Summary of key supporting points Clear statement of requested relief or outcome Final persuasive appeal based on law and equity Citation Structure Guidance: Proper citation format for [JURISDICTION] Strategic use of quotations vs. paraphrasing Signal recommendations (e.g., see, see also, but see) Parallel citation guidance when needed Parenthetical explanation recommendations This structure should present the strongest possible legal argument while acknowledging and effectively countering opposing positions. The brief should be organized to maximize persuasive impact while maintaining strict adherence to legal writing conventions and ethical standards.

Create a structured legal brief for the following legal argument from the perspective of an experienced legal writer with expertise in persuasive legal argumentation. Legal position to argue: [LEGAL_POSITION] Opposing position: [OPPOSING_POSITION] Relevant jurisdiction: [JURISDICTION] Please create a comprehensive legal brief structure including: Introduction/Summary of Argument: Concise statement of the legal issue presented Clear statement of the position being advocated Brief overview of the strongest supporting authorities Requested outcome or relief sought Roadmap of the arguments to follow Legal Standard: Applicable standard of review or burden of proof Key statutory language or precedential tests that govern Threshold requirements that must be satisfied Legal framework for analyzing the specific issue Factual Background: Relevant factual context presented objectively Procedural history as necessary Key undisputed facts that support the argument Strategic presentation of favorable facts Argument Section I: [PRIMARY_ARGUMENT] Clear argument heading that states the conclusion Primary legal authority supporting this argument Application of law to the specific facts of this case Anticipated counterarguments and refutations Policy considerations that strengthen the position Argument Section II: [SECONDARY_ARGUMENT] Clear argumentative heading Supporting authorities and precedents Factual application Distinction of adverse authorities Response to likely opposing arguments Argument Section III: [ADDITIONAL_ARGUMENT] Additional argument structure following the same pattern Alternative arguments or secondary theories Distinguishing unfavorable precedent Addressing potential weaknesses in the position Conclusion: Concise restatement of the position Summary of key supporting points Clear statement of requested relief or outcome Final persuasive appeal based on law and equity Citation Structure Guidance: Proper citation format for [JURISDICTION] Strategic use of quotations vs. paraphrasing Signal recommendations (e.g., see, see also, but see) Parallel citation guidance when needed Parenthetical explanation recommendations This structure should present the strongest possible legal argument while acknowledging and effectively countering opposing positions. The brief should be organized to maximize persuasive impact while maintaining strict adherence to legal writing conventions and ethical standards.

Best for

Best for

Attorneys, law students, paralegals, self-represented litigants

Attorneys, law students, paralegals, self-represented litigants

Works with

Works with

ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, and more

ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, and more

Level

Level

Intermediate to advanced

Intermediate to advanced

Icon

Free to share
Help others with copy link

Icon
Icon
Icon

Works with all AI tools
ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, and more