Your ChatGPT, Midjourney, Gemini, Grok Prompt
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini Prompts for Academic Research Paper Structure
Use ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, or Gemini to create structures for academic research papers by subject

AI Prompt:
Create a comprehensive research paper framework for a [PAPER_TYPE: empirical study, literature review, theoretical analysis, case study, etc.] in the field of [ACADEMIC_DISCIPLINE] focusing on the topic of [RESEARCH_TOPIC]. The paper will be approximately [WORD_COUNT] words and should follow the conventions of [CITATION_STYLE]. Research question/hypothesis: [RESEARCH_QUESTION] Available research/data: [AVAILABLE_RESEARCH_OR_DATA] Generate a detailed research paper structure with: Title and Abstract Framework: Title construction guidance with formula and examples | Abstract structure (word count: [ABSTRACT_LENGTH]) | Key component sequencing | Keyword selection strategy | Impact statement development | Gap identification articulation | Contribution highlighting approach Introduction Architecture: Problem statement formulation | Research gap identification language | Significance establishment | Theoretical framework positioning | Research question/hypothesis presentation | Study scope delineation | Paper organization overview | Introduction length recommendation Literature Review Structure: Organization approach (chronological, thematic, methodological) | Key literature strand identification | Source hierarchy establishment | Theoretical framework integration | Controversy or debate presentation | Gap reinforcement strategy | Synthesis rather than summary guidance | Transition to methodology Methodology Framework: Research design justification | Participant/sample selection criteria | Data collection procedure documentation | Measurement instrument description | Analytical approach justification | Validity and reliability establishment | Ethical consideration discussion | Limitations acknowledgment Results Presentation: Data organization strategy | Statistical analysis reporting conventions | Finding categorization approach | Visual representation recommendations | Null result reporting guidance | Effect size interpretation | Results without discussion discipline | Subheading structure recommendation Discussion Construction: Finding interpretation approach | Theoretical implication development | Literature comparison methodology | Alternative explanation consideration | Limitation impact assessment | Generalizability evaluation | Research agenda advancement | Practical implication articulation Conclusion Development: Contribution summary technique | Research question revisitation | Key finding synthesis | Theoretical advancement articulation | Practical application identification | Future research direction specification | Closing impact statement | Conclusion length guidance Disciplinary Convention Adherence: Field-specific terminology integration | Methodological expectations for [ACADEMIC_DISCIPLINE] | Evidence standard adherence | Theoretical positioning norms | Citation density guidance | Objectivity vs. positionality balance | Journal-specific formatting considerations Please provide a comprehensive outline that follows the research paper conventions specific to [ACADEMIC_DISCIPLINE], with annotations explaining the rationale behind structural choices. Include sample sentences, transition phrases, and section templates that align with scholarly expectations in this field.
Best for
Students, academics, researchers, graduate students, professors, scholarly writers
Works with
ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, and more
Level
Intermediate to advanced

Free to share
Help others with copy link

Works with all AI tools
ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, and more