

Your ChatGPT, Midjourney, Gemini, Grok Prompt
Legal Argument Constructor: ChatGPT, Claude & Grok Prompts
Legal Argument Constructor: ChatGPT, Claude & Grok Prompts
Use ChatGPT, Claude, or Grok to develop structured legal positions with clear issue identification, rule articulation, and fact application
Use ChatGPT, Claude, or Grok to develop structured legal positions with clear issue identification, rule articulation, and fact application

AI Prompt:
I need you to help me construct a well-structured legal argument regarding [LEGAL ISSUE] under [JURISDICTION] law. The key facts and context of the situation are: Relevant facts: [KEY FACTS OF THE SITUATION] Disputed issues: [POINTS OF CONTENTION] Legal context: [AREA OF LAW/PROCEEDING TYPE] Position to argue: [SIDE TO ADVOCATE FOR] Available authorities: [KNOWN RELEVANT CASES/STATUTES] Opposing arguments: [ANTICIPATED COUNTERARGUMENTS] Forum: [COURT/TRIBUNAL/CONTEXT WHERE ARGUMENT WILL BE PRESENTED] Please develop a comprehensive legal argument using the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) method that includes the following elements: 1. Issue Framing Clear statement of the precise legal question(s) Procedural posture context Burden of proof identification Standard of review (if applicable) Jurisdiction-specific framing Policy considerations context 2. Rule Identification & Exposition Relevant statutory provisions with precise citations Controlling case law with complete citations Elements/factors breakdown Rule development through precedent Tests or frameworks established by courts Jurisdiction-specific interpretations Secondary authority support (if appropriate) 3. Rule Application to Facts Systematic application of each element/factor Explicit connection between specific facts and legal requirements Analogies to favorable precedent Distinctions from unfavorable precedent Weighing of factors (if applicable) Addressing factual uncertainties Alternative applications (if appropriate) 4. Counterargument Anticipation & Response Identification of strongest opposing arguments Accurate and fair characterization of opposition Specific rebuttals to each point Weaknesses in opposing authorities Distinguishing unfavorable precedent Policy counter-considerations 5. Policy & Equity Considerations Broader implications of each outcome Judicial economy considerations Precedential impact concerns Legislative intent analysis Societal impact considerations Court's role within legal system 6. Conclusion & Relief Logical conclusion from argument Specific outcome or relief requested Alternative arguments/relief if appropriate Summary of strongest points Forward-looking considerations Practical implications Please draft this legal argument using precise legal terminology appropriate for [FORUM], with proper citation format for [JURISDICTION]. The argument should be thorough yet concise, with a persuasive but professional tone. Format the argument with clear section headings, paragraph breaks for readability, and appropriate emphasis on key points.
I need you to help me construct a well-structured legal argument regarding [LEGAL ISSUE] under [JURISDICTION] law. The key facts and context of the situation are: Relevant facts: [KEY FACTS OF THE SITUATION] Disputed issues: [POINTS OF CONTENTION] Legal context: [AREA OF LAW/PROCEEDING TYPE] Position to argue: [SIDE TO ADVOCATE FOR] Available authorities: [KNOWN RELEVANT CASES/STATUTES] Opposing arguments: [ANTICIPATED COUNTERARGUMENTS] Forum: [COURT/TRIBUNAL/CONTEXT WHERE ARGUMENT WILL BE PRESENTED] Please develop a comprehensive legal argument using the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) method that includes the following elements: 1. Issue Framing Clear statement of the precise legal question(s) Procedural posture context Burden of proof identification Standard of review (if applicable) Jurisdiction-specific framing Policy considerations context 2. Rule Identification & Exposition Relevant statutory provisions with precise citations Controlling case law with complete citations Elements/factors breakdown Rule development through precedent Tests or frameworks established by courts Jurisdiction-specific interpretations Secondary authority support (if appropriate) 3. Rule Application to Facts Systematic application of each element/factor Explicit connection between specific facts and legal requirements Analogies to favorable precedent Distinctions from unfavorable precedent Weighing of factors (if applicable) Addressing factual uncertainties Alternative applications (if appropriate) 4. Counterargument Anticipation & Response Identification of strongest opposing arguments Accurate and fair characterization of opposition Specific rebuttals to each point Weaknesses in opposing authorities Distinguishing unfavorable precedent Policy counter-considerations 5. Policy & Equity Considerations Broader implications of each outcome Judicial economy considerations Precedential impact concerns Legislative intent analysis Societal impact considerations Court's role within legal system 6. Conclusion & Relief Logical conclusion from argument Specific outcome or relief requested Alternative arguments/relief if appropriate Summary of strongest points Forward-looking considerations Practical implications Please draft this legal argument using precise legal terminology appropriate for [FORUM], with proper citation format for [JURISDICTION]. The argument should be thorough yet concise, with a persuasive but professional tone. Format the argument with clear section headings, paragraph breaks for readability, and appropriate emphasis on key points.
Best for
Best for
Law students, attorneys, legal briefs, moot court preparation, legal analysis, paralegals
Law students, attorneys, legal briefs, moot court preparation, legal analysis, paralegals
Works with
Works with
ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, and Other AI Assistants
ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, and Other AI Assistants
Level
Level
Advanced
Advanced

Works with all AI Assistant Chat tools
ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, and Other AI Assistants Chat



Free to Share Prompt
Help Others With Copy This AI Prompt Link